APPENDIX I-N:
Any Study of Aerial Spraying over
Tue Jun 26
spot> pine
PINE 4.64 MESSAGE TEXT Folder: INBOX Message 327 of 328 19%
Date:
From: rmpjc <rmpjc@earthlink.net>
To: angela medbery <a.medbery@juno.com>
Cc: angela medbery <a.medbery@juno.com>, betty ball <rmpjc@earthlink.net>,
caitlin waddick <cwaddick@mindspring.com>,
cosima krueger <cardamomseed@aol.com>,
jill sverdlove <jsverdlove@aol.com>, jim morris <jim@jimmorris.com>,
kathleen christensen <kathjackrose@comcast.net>,
kirk cunningham <kmcunnin@juno.com>,
marty walter <walter@boulder.colorado.edu>,
Mary Louise Chavers <kushi80306@yahoo.com>,
randy weiner <ecolaw@Bsuites.com>,
stephanie
Tim Seastedt <Timothy.Seastedt@colorado.edu>,
tom
barb patton <barbpatton@earthlink.net>,
elsie klassen <asliimp@comcast.net>, jen sutton <jensutton2@juno.com>,
uma bacso <umabacso@indra.com>,
kirsten burris <kirsten.burris@frontrange.edu>,SSH Secure Shell 3.2.0 (Build 267)
kirsten burris <kirsten.burris@frontrange.edu>,
anne lee maziar
<
Subject: Re: WNV Bldr report on meeting with state health today
wow -- thanks for getting this info from Brenda and sending it -- we
have a meeting tonite!
betty
----- Original Message -----
From: angela medbery
To: rmpjc@earthlink.net
Sent:
Subject: Re: WNV Bldr report on meeting with state health today
On
Hi Angela
Sorry I missed you on the phone.
What I think would be a vital point to make to your
commissioners is the fact that the
not an accepted, ethical scientific study. It violates
EPA rules which prohibit testing of pesticides in
pregnant women and children. It also violates "Common
Rule" for ethical testing in humans. There was no informed
consent from the community to see if we were willing to
be sprayed with a pesticide to see if it stopped the
transmission of
ethical study is an independent board review. That's how
all ethical medical research is done. These facts would
preclude the EPA from accepting this flawed "study"
proving spraying a pesticide stops
the CDC and ask them about a study that proves that (just
don't call Roger Nasci; call the main headquarters).
There are no studies. See EPA website for more details
about testing of pesticides in humans.
Also, be sure to let them know the outcome of the NYC
lawsuit for when they were sprayed. Let them know what
the city now has to say about the pesticides, and that
thousands have been sickened and others have died, from
pesticide-related damages. Remind them that they and the
applicators are legally responsible for any pesticide
damages, not the manufacturer.
Now that Gov. Ritter recognizes MCS is real, remind them
that Dr. Pape knows nothing about this "disease" and has
not been trained in the specialty of Environmental
Medicine. The only MD in the state who is trained in this
emerging field of science, is Dr. Wezensky, here in GJ.
He testified in the state legislature in Mar. about the
damaging effects of the chemicals used in the oil and gas
industry, helping to get the recent legislation in
place. In all their recommendations for spraying there is
no EPA measurement of what is a safe dose of pesticide
for the MCS individual. A person with MCS is not taken
into consideration when determining/calculating the
acceptable doses and risks of exposures. The individual
genetic and ability of citizens to detoxify chemicals are
not included in their assumptions. If, as found in a
study published in 2003, about 10% of the population has
MCS, but there's not 10% of the population sick from West
Good luck!
Brenda